• // This is the English version of my thoughts about websites, this is *not* a word-by-word translation.

    I am trying to list what a BSP's website can provide to bloggers and readers, and I listed the services BSP website cannot provide.

    Please, please comment and enrich the list.

    • Relatively safe storage, backup is by-default. Data will not lost in the near future.
    • Accessibility. Users - either human or robot - can access, if they can find it.
    • Name space. A username on a BSP is unique. When I say "I read keso's blog", actually I mean: I read a blog named keso @ donews.com, rather than I read a blog named keso @ whatever.
    • Trust is a direct result from name space, the need to trust a real person is transformed into trust in a unique name in the virtual space. This trust is critical in online community.
    • Filtering, sorting and referral. Saves time for readers.

    What BSP website cannot provide:

    • Always online: website may go down. And it does happens!
    • Data consistency: blogger may delete posts.
    • Data integerity: This is largely replying on the reputation of the website or BSP, but data tampering still happens.
    • Users' perference. Editors may skip an interesting post, while readers just forget to recommend after reading it.

  • 这是对BSP网站向bloggers和读者提供服务的分析,选择BSP是因为本文是个blog.
    欢迎补充.
    1. 提供相对安全的存储空间,缺省的备份服务 - 数据短期内不容易丢.
    2. 访问许可,其他用户(人,机器)可以访问 - 如果找得到的话.
    3. 命名空间,在一个BSP上的名字是唯一的 - 比如我读keso的blog,其实是读keso @ donews.com 的blog,而不是 keso @ 随便什么地方 的blog.
    4. 由命名空间产生的是用户信任,把对个人的信任需求转化为对特定名字的信任 - 这在虚拟社区非常重要.
    5. 筛选,分类和推荐 - 节省用户时间.

    BSP所不能提供的:

    • 永远在线 - 天要下雨,网要断线.
    • 数据的一致性 - 天要下雨,网要断线,人要删贴.
    • 数据的真实性 - 只能靠网站的信誉来迫使用户相信,文章没有被过分的修改过,那么那些***原来是什么东西?
    • 用户投票 - 编辑不是超人,挂一漏万总是有的,用户看过就算,懒得投票.
  • // Posted on Nov 24th 2005 at blogger.com, however blogspot is blocked by GFW, moving here

    // English version of my question to keso, this is *not* a word-by-word translation.

    Keso, I have a question: Is website a must? Seems no matter what one wants to do, startup or non-profit or blog, a website is one of the first things one thinks about.

    Is it because we need centralized storage? But is there a last-forever website? Hot as those once-hot companies like DEC, Wang's, SGI... Netscape was hot, will Google become next Netscape? Or maybe Microsoft is the next Lotus? You mentioned network storage is more reliable, but there are many who do not believe.

    Is it because we can only trust something with a central-control? We trust Google's not-to-be-evil motto, we present Google with everything, from our family to our job to our own deepest desire, and then start worrying about "What if Google..."

    Is it because we need decent information source? Then why for many, the first thing online is reading news at CNN.com or sina.com, and the second things is saying or typing "bull sh!t"?

    Is it because we are all same-old web 1.0? Then why BSP is also a centralized website, and blogs are posted to old-style websites?

    Is it because the Internet is born like this? I thought the Internet is designed to be nuke-safe, so far there's no nuke on the Internet, but everyday there are websites that are "nuked", and I cannot find stuff I need.

    Is it because websites own the content? Then why those newspapers are starved by websites? Does your blog belong to donews.com?

    Is it because websites can do a better job hosting our content? Then why there're forum masters who can delete my post that many people love? How dare some web forum owner crash the server and leave me with a "404 not found", when I'm searching for my *own* post?

    Now it's clear to me, getting online is just self-torturing: I post my valuable content to someone who I never know, let he/she/it put the content somewhere, without knowing if it's backuped or tampered, and then I go to see other people's content he/she/it recommends, and I may even get charged...